>Kapil has a higher GPA than Pavan. Madan has a higher GPA than Adi Shan has a higher GPA than Madan.>Thus, it follows that Kapil has a higher GPA than Adi.>Which of the following, if introduced into the argument as an additional premise, makes the argument>above logically incorrect?
Answers
Answered by
4
Answer:
what is GPA ? kapil, pawan, madan
Answered by
0
Answer:
The premise> Madan has a higher GPA than Adi makes the argument logically incorrect.
Explanation:
According to the argument we can make two sets of rankings (highest to lowest GPA)
A: KAPIL
PAWAN
B: SHAN
MADAN
ADI
We can see that set 1 has no correlation with set 2. Hence the argument stands logically incorrect because of the premise that Madan has higher GPA than Adi.
#SPJ3
Similar questions