guess and write would if Jahangir had denied the British trade in India?
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
you go on you tube and vedantu note
Explanation:
please please
Answered by
1
Answer:
If Jahangir had denied the British trade in India, The British rule over India would not happen.
Explanation:
- Fragmented nation: In the absence of British rule, 60-100 princely states would co-exist as affinities or rivals.
- The decline of the Mughal Empire: Mughals survived as puppet states under the influence of the East India Company. However, their power declined as the borders of their territories receded toward Delhi and Uttar Pradesh and as weak rulers. The Kashmir, Punjab and the Rajputs were their threat to the Mughals.
- Presence of European powers: In the absence of British power, other European powers enter the waters of Asia.
- Consolidation of British power elsewhere: The British colonies were strong in Australia, Africa, and the Americas. If India is not a part of their territory, the British would have managed to suppress the American Revolution and put their interests in these lands.
- Very slow development of railways: The railways were introduced by the British in 1871. In the absence of British rule, the emergence of railways would come later and would not have covered every part of the County.
Hence, If Jahangir had not accepted the British trade in India, there would be a fragmented nation, a decline of Mughals, and a very slow development of railways.
Similar questions
Science,
11 hours ago
Math,
21 hours ago
Science,
21 hours ago
Math,
8 months ago
Political Science,
8 months ago