had the narrator always been blind? How can you say that
Answers
Answer:
nahi ke sakta me tuje^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^:-):-):-):-D
Answer:
ined to the limited perspective of the novel’s many blind characters. Full of irony and sarcasm, the narrative voice wanders in and out of characters’ thoughts, to which he or she often has complete access but occasionally has no access at all. To some readers, it may be unclear whether the narrator is faithfully reporting facts or simply speculating about what may have happened. In fact, the narrator’s self-consciously ironic attempts to appear objective—for instance, by rewriting the man with the black eyepatch’s report on the world outside the quarantine zone to give it more “rigour and suitability”—actually make it clear that the narrator really only offers one among many perspectives on the events of the book. Just like the Government’s heavy-handed attempts to control the blindness epidemic (and the public’s beliefs about it) actually backfire by revealing the Government’s incompetence, the narrator’s jokes and criticisms about the novel’s characters make it clear that they do not have answers to the most mysterious and fundamental questions running through the book: where does the white blindness come from, how does it spread throughout the population, and why does it suddenly disappear at the end of the book?