Himachal Pradesh - like Jammu and Kashmir once did - continues to have special status in the Constitution. Do some research and write down any one feature that this special status gives Himachal.
Answers
Answer:
On 5 August 2019, the Government of India revoked the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state, and a part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute among India, Pakistan, and China since 1947.[1][2]
Among the Indian government actions accompanying the revocation was the cutting off of communication lines in the Kashmir Valley, a region gripped by a prolonged separatist insurgency.[3] Several leading Kashmiri politicians were taken into custody, including the former chief minister, Mehbooba Mufti, who called the day the blackest in India's democracy.[4][3] Government officials described these restrictions as designed for preempting violence,[5] and justified the revocation for enabling people of the state to access government programmes such as reservation, right to education and right to information.[6]
International human rights groups condemned the revocation resolution.[4] The reaction in the Kashmir Valley was effectively reduced to silence because of cut-off communication.[4][3] Many Hindu nationalists celebrated, declaring the move to herald public order and prosperity in Kashmir.[4] Among political parties in India, the revocation was supported by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, and, among others, by the Bahujan Samaj Party, the Aam Aadmi Party, AIADMK, Telegu Desam Party, and the Shiv Sena. It was opposed by the Indian National Congress, Jammu & Kashmir National Conference, Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party, Trinamool Congress, Janata Dal (United) and the DMK.[7][8] In Ladakh, people in the Kargil area, who are Shia Muslim and form the plurality of the population of Ladakh, protested;[9][10] however, the Buddhist community in Ladakh supported the decision.
The President of India issued an order under the power of Article 370, overriding the prevailing 1954 Presidential Order and nullifying all the provisions of autonomy granted to the state. The Home Minister introduced a Reorganisation Bill in the Indian Parliament, seeking to divide the state into two union territories to be governed by a lieutenant governor and a unicameral legislature. The resolution seeking the revocation of the special status under Article 370 and the bill for the state's reorganisation was debated and passed by the Rajya Sabha – India's upper house of parliament – on 5 August 2019.[13] On 6 August, the Lok Sabha – India's lower house of parliament – debated and passed the reorganisation bill along with the resolution recommending the revocation.[14][15] The constitutional expert opinion is divided on whether the revocation is legally sound.