Environmental Sciences, asked by amit22verma, 9 months ago

Himalayan degradation

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by aswathi71
0

Explanation:

Some of the human activities are mining, increasing infrastructure due to increased population, agriculturalactivities, road development, encroachment in forestlands, interferences of biotic components with natural inhabitants of the area etc.

PLS MARK AS BRAINLIST....

Answered by hashmatalikhan0935
0

Answer:

Explanation:The so-called ‘Theory of Himalayan Environmental Degradation’ predicted

an environmental collapse by the end of last millennium, threatening the

life of millions of people. Fortunately, the all-encompassing crisis did

not materialize. The article shows that the ‘Theory’ failed to take into

account the vast ecological variation in Himalaya and thus generalized

its contentions to the whole mountain range on the basis of deficient

data. But, on the other hand, what would have happened if the prediction

had not been made? A doomsday scenario like the Theory of Himalayan

Degradation can, from the perspective of positivist hypothesis testing, be

viewed a posteriori as a failed prediction; but from another perspective it

can be seen as an alarm clock that triggered a series of policy initiatives

and new knowledge.

Keywords: Environmental degradation; Himalaya; farming systems;

ecological variation

Introduction

From time to time, doomsday scenarios enter global academic and political discourses.

The gloomy future that was intimated in The Limits to Growth created great havoc in

the 1970s (Meadows et al., 1972). More recently, Huntington’s notion of the Clash of

Civilisations (1993) activated a heated debate over the future of multiculturalism. A

hallmark of such scenarios is that they rarely come true. The 1984 passed much more

pleasantly than Huxley envisaged. But should we thereby dismiss them as useless, as

failed predictions that the world would have made better without?

Similar questions