hlw mates,
plz answer the question ...
whosoever's answer will be more satisfactory I will mark it as BRAINLIEST ....
so,
here is the question
Why does life use a quanternary system ( A, T, G, C) to encode information instead of a binary
system ??
Answers
Answered by
0
Acutally it's a tradition of the people to take quarter and to encode themself while in binary it becomes overload
xyz5232:
this ia the first time I git 18 pts thanks
Answered by
5
As correctly stated by Alex Khomenko, a two nucleotide alphabet would require a much longer codon to encode an equal number of amino acids. But hold on a minute, if this is the only force at work then why stop at four nucleotides? Shouldn't a six nucleotide alphabet be able to create 62=3662=36 amino acid combinations, sufficient for all amino acids with stop codons and some degeneracy while also lowering the codon requirement from three to two and thus condensing the information by 50%? You've just stumbled onto part of one of the most interesting open questions in origin of life research, and one that probes the fundamental question of how the biopolymers we know today evolved in early life on Earth! Due to various competing constraints, four appears to be the optimal number of nucleotides.
Similar questions