ho 4. What is the main criterion used by the World Bank in classifying different countries? What are the limitations of this criterion, it any? 5. In what respects is the criterion used by the UNDP for measuring development different from the one used by the World Bank? 6. Why do we use averages? Are there any limitations to their use? illustrate w your own examples related to development. 7. Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Haryana. Hence, per capita income is noi a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. Do you agree? Discuss. 8. Find out the present sources of energy that are used by the people in India. What could be the other possibilities fifty years from now? 9. Why is the issue of sustainability important for development?
Answers
Explanation:
Income(average income) is the main criterion used by World Bank in classifying different countries.
Doesn't define the actual income earned. Other aspects such as education, non materialistic needs are ignored.
Kerala has a better human development as their government are providing good basic facilities and in a cheaper rate.
Answer:
Here you can go with your answer... ☺
Waittttt!!! The answer for Q. ( In what respect is the criteria used by the UNDP for measuring development different from the one used by the World Bank ? )
Answer= World Bank only uses per capita income for measuring development while UNDP uses many factors like infant mortality,healthcare facility &Education level which help in improving the quality of life and helps in making the citizens more productive.
