Ho is better human teachers or machine teachers
Answers
Answered by
8
Well, I personally feel that human beings are naturally gifted with ‘strong sensory feelings’ or what we say emotions, which is artificially imposed in Robot teachers. Even though instances have been odd nowadays, the sense of empathy, sympathy, social understandings or better to say psychological comprehends present in human teachers could not be ignored.
The best part of Human teachers are:
Human beings have different behavioural and psychological levels that defines their social skills and interactivity. Even human are different and unique in their own senses.
Automatically human teachers are powered with such cognitive-social-psychological mixtures to make the generations learn naturally. It is prompt and no formatting or programming is required.
How much the technical developments are, it surely is difficult for robot teachers to match up to the ‘unique’ social skills and cognitive ratio exclusively found in humans. A case of the Finland’s education system can be referred here where the educators are channeling different teaching methods without using technical solution mostly.
Also the conventional teaching approach get a thumbs up by using a creative spirit which is a creation of man’s own mind and soul. And the use of such philosophies human teachers have all the natural tendencies to deliver the best and original teaching methods to groom a child.
The Robot Teachers pro and cons:
Robot teachers can accelerate the schedule of teaching if not programmed or formatted well. They are followed up by the artificial intelligence which is nothing but an alternative or substitution of human basic reactions - something which the robots have imitated through the research and development phases.
It is not able to create real or natural reaction to critically complex human tendencies or have the same amount of human touch thing. Somewhat it will be mechanically be presented, loosing out the real human spirits of being living.
Robot Cultural lacks creative senses.
Robots, on the other hand are used to read the human tendencies based on some calculative and categorically advanced research mediums.
This is can be possibly a good-way to refer to live tutoring for the online courses or e-learning programs, if candidates are to select the odd hours. But that should be for a temporary period, maybe just to quickly refer to the FAQ’s of adult learners.
Personally I feel a lot is still required to replace human teachers with Robots. Research is going on to make it them common in the classroom settings, which definitely is a hell lot challenging than situation programmed in their robotic system.
It may also hamper the student-teacher bond. Because feel is evident if the reactions are manual and real. Also Human teachers should be their to continue with the effect of life, challenges, happiness and activities or else it civilization will be at great risk if Robots start taking the charge.
The best part of Human teachers are:
Human beings have different behavioural and psychological levels that defines their social skills and interactivity. Even human are different and unique in their own senses.
Automatically human teachers are powered with such cognitive-social-psychological mixtures to make the generations learn naturally. It is prompt and no formatting or programming is required.
How much the technical developments are, it surely is difficult for robot teachers to match up to the ‘unique’ social skills and cognitive ratio exclusively found in humans. A case of the Finland’s education system can be referred here where the educators are channeling different teaching methods without using technical solution mostly.
Also the conventional teaching approach get a thumbs up by using a creative spirit which is a creation of man’s own mind and soul. And the use of such philosophies human teachers have all the natural tendencies to deliver the best and original teaching methods to groom a child.
The Robot Teachers pro and cons:
Robot teachers can accelerate the schedule of teaching if not programmed or formatted well. They are followed up by the artificial intelligence which is nothing but an alternative or substitution of human basic reactions - something which the robots have imitated through the research and development phases.
It is not able to create real or natural reaction to critically complex human tendencies or have the same amount of human touch thing. Somewhat it will be mechanically be presented, loosing out the real human spirits of being living.
Robot Cultural lacks creative senses.
Robots, on the other hand are used to read the human tendencies based on some calculative and categorically advanced research mediums.
This is can be possibly a good-way to refer to live tutoring for the online courses or e-learning programs, if candidates are to select the odd hours. But that should be for a temporary period, maybe just to quickly refer to the FAQ’s of adult learners.
Personally I feel a lot is still required to replace human teachers with Robots. Research is going on to make it them common in the classroom settings, which definitely is a hell lot challenging than situation programmed in their robotic system.
It may also hamper the student-teacher bond. Because feel is evident if the reactions are manual and real. Also Human teachers should be their to continue with the effect of life, challenges, happiness and activities or else it civilization will be at great risk if Robots start taking the charge.
Similar questions