Question

hola mates...
explain your views on today's supreme court verdict on ram mandir in ayodhya.....​

Answer 1

It affirmed the disputed spot was the birthplace of Lord Ram, that the Babri Masjid was built after the demolition of a Hindu temple, and that the mosque was not built in accordance with the tenets of Islam. The Supreme Court suspended this ruling in 2011 after both Hindu and Muslim groups appealed against it.1

Answer 2

Answer:

Forget 'achhe din', Supreme Court's Ayodhya case verdict could pave the way for Modi's return in 2019

With the Supreme Court paving the way for an early verdict, the politics around Ram Mandir is already getting a jumpstart.

POLITICS | 5-minute read | 27-09-2018

Saif Ullah KhanSAIF ULLAH KHAN @saifizm

A three-judge Supreme Court bench, headed by CJI Dipak Misra on September 27 ruled that the 1994 Ismail Faruqui judgment need not be referred to a larger bench.

In a majority 2:1 judgment, the SC declined to revisit its own 1994 ruling.

CJI Dipak Misra and Justice Ashok Bhushan denied the plea, saying the 1994 ruling was made in the context of acquisition.

Justice Bhushan, reading out the judgment on behalf of the CJI, said the earlier order of mosques not being integral to Islam was in the context of the State's right to acquire land under eminent domain.