Social Sciences, asked by sanjeebsahu636, 10 months ago

Home work

Q1.What attracted European trading companies to India?

Q2.What were the areas of conflict between the Bengal nawabs and the East India Company?

Q3.Explain the system of “subsidiary alliance”.

Q4.
How did the assumption of Diwani benefit the East India Company?​

Answers

Answered by komalbhullar20
1

Hope its help u❤❤✌✌✌

Explanation:

the fine qualities of cotton and silk produced in india had a big market in europe.this attracted them.

Ans 2:pic .

ans 3: it was a major process that led to building of britsh empire in india

Ans 4: the diwani allowed the company to exploit the vast venue resources of bengal.

Attachments:
Answered by Anonymous
1

What attracted European trading companies to India?

Ans. European trading companies were attracted to India because of a number of reasons:

Trading with India was highly profitable and fruitful to the businessmen in Europe.

The European trading companies purchased goods at cheaper and sold them in Europe at the higher prices.

In Europe, the fine qualities of silk and cotton produced in India had a big market in Europe.

In Europe, Indian spices like - pepper, cloves, cardamom, and cinnamon were in great demand.

The intra fights between the Indian rulers helped the European trading companies, through Divide and Rule policy, established their power in India.

What were the areas of conflict between the Bengal Nawabs and the East India Company?

Ans. The areas of conflict between the Bengal nawabs and the East India Company are mentioned below:

The Bengal nawabs asserted their power and autonomy and refused to grant the company concessions.

They demanded large tributes for the Company’s right to trade.

They denied the Company any right to mint coins and stopped the Company from extending its fortifications.

Accusing the Company of deceit, they claimed that the Company was depriving the Bengal government of huge amounts of revenue and undermining the authority of the Nawab. It was refusing to pay taxes, writing disrespectful letters, and trying to humiliate the Nawab and his officials.

The Company on its part declared that the unjust demands of the local officials were ruining the trade of the Company, and trade could flourish only if the duties were removed.

How did the assumption of Diwani benefit the East India Company?

Ans. In 1765, the Mughal emperor appointed the Company as the Diwan of the provinces of Bengal. The Diwani right to the East India Company benefited it in several ways:

The Diwani allowed the Company to use the vast revenue resources of Bengal.

Trade was monopolised by the East India Company. The company began direct plunder of India’s wealth.

The Company expenses were being financed from the Revenues of India. These revenues were used to purchase cotton and silk textiles in India, maintain Company troops, and meet the cost of building the Company fort and offices at Calcutta.

To monopolize trade & dictate terms. The company used its political power. They could impose their own prices that had no relation to the costs of production.

The company used revenue of Bengal to finance exports of Indian goods.

Explain the system of "subsidiary alliance".

Ans. After the battle of Plassey in 1757, the battle of Buxar in 1764 and gaining the Diwani of Bengal, the company began to expand its rule in many parts of India. For that it had devised several plans, one among them was the “Subsidiary Alliance”. Subsidiary Alliance system was means used by the Company to extend its control over the Indian states.

According to the terms of this alliance -

The East India Company behaved as a guardian of the State.

The State appointed an English Resident in its court, to check the activities of the king.

Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces.

The State could not give shelter to any other European other than English in its army.

The Indian states entering into subsidiary alliance were protected by the Company’s forces but had to pay for the maintenance of the British troops. The Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces. If the Indian rulers failed to make payments to the British, part of their kingdom was taken away as penalty.

Similar questions