Question

how and why did so many different ways of worshipping the same god develop?
( ye question cg course ke 9th class ke history ka chapter 7 the reformation and the enlightenment (1300-1800 CE) se hai )​

Answer 1

Answer:

Even though the ancient and medieval worlds did not have conceptions resembling the modern understandings of "science" or of "religion",[1] certain elements of modern ideas on the subject recur throughout history. The pair-structured phrases "religion and science" and "science and religion" first emerged in the literature in the 19th century.[2][3] This coincided with the refining of "science" (from the studies of "natural philosophy") and of "religion" as distinct concepts in the preceding few centuries—partly due to professionalization of the sciences, the Protestant Reformation, colonization, and globalization.[4][5][6] Since then the relationship between science and religion has been characterized in terms of 'conflict', 'harmony', 'complexity', and 'mutual independence', among others.

Both science and religion are complex social and cultural endeavors that vary across cultures and change over time.[7][8][9] Most scientific (and technical) innovations prior to the scientific revolution were achieved by societies organized by religious traditions. Ancient pagan, Islamic, and Christian scholars pioneered individual elements of the scientific method. Roger Bacon, often credited with formalizing the scientific method, was a Franciscan friar.[10] Confucian thought, whether religious or non-religious in nature, has held different views of science over time. Many 21st-century Buddhists view science as complementary to their beliefs. While the classification of the material world by the ancient Indians and Greeks into air, earth, fire and water was more metaphysical, and figures like Anaxagoras questioned certain popular views of Greek divinities, medieval Middle Eastern scholars empirically classified materials.[11]

Events in Europe such as the Galileo affair of the early 17th century, associated with the scientific revolution and the Age of Enlightenment, led scholars such as John William Draper to postulate (c.  1874) a conflict thesis, suggesting that religion and science have been in conflict methodologically, factually and politically throughout history. Some contemporary scientists (such as Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss, Peter Atkins, and Donald Prothero) subscribe to this thesis. However, the conflict thesis has lost favor among most contemporary historians of science.[12][13][14]

Explanation:

please mark as brainlist answer please

Answer 2

It happened due to the wrong faith, culture and traditions that come down from generation to generation.

• Religion must be alive, energetic, moving, and progressing since it is the outward manifestation of the divine truth.
• The divine prophets revealed and established religion, outlining a number of heavenly precepts and regulations for the benefit of humanity.
• The revelation of the divine institutions must be progressive and ongoing since they are always active and evolving.
• Religions are rife with prejudiced imitations, but ancient rules and moral codes will not hold up to the demands of the contemporary world. Because of his father, a guy is a Jew.
• The Muhammadan implicitly adopts the beliefs and customs of his forefathers.

#spj2