How are we different from nature? pls answer fast
Answers
we are are different from nature because it gives us air and many things and we does not give anything to nature
Explanation:
mark me as a brilliant answer
Answer:
Actually, this is an interesting question.
It should be answerable as that there is no difference, whatever we do is natural. As other answers here say, we are part of nature. I think though that there is more to it if you want a good answer. It turns out though that there is an interesting corollary to that. I mostly study the idea that humans need to adapt to a new ecology, because when we started farming and cities, we left the hunter-gatherer tribal ecology we came from. To survive we need to adapt genetically and strategically to a new ecology, but what is that new ecology. We have been going through transient ecologies ever since we started farming and cities. The ecology of a species is defined as the energetics and reproductive features of the specie. So that means you have a hunter gatherer (energetics, where their resources came from) tribalist (reproduction, the reproductive context of a social animal). What is the energetic and reproductive context of humans moving forward then? Well, our energetic strategies have been dependent on farming for our food as well as we relied on things that we could burn, from firewood to fossil fuels, for a variety of needs. Beasts of burden would fit in there too - donkeys, horses, oxen, etc. In the future, it would be appropriate to say all our resources will come from technology, even farming. We are likely to be producing meats from tissue culture when we learn how to do it economically. Our energy will come from solar, wind, fission, fusion and other "high tech" sources. Notice, none of those resources come from nature (relatively speaking).
How about the reproduction part in this new ecology? Our society is transitioning from tribal (dealing with small groups that are very similar to self) to Civilization (larger, complex groups that are often very different in genetic nature and beliefs). Civilization is an odd name for an ecology, but it does describe the social nature, so the new ecology would be perhaps called Techno-Civilization to describe our energetic and reproductive (social) strategy. There is another part of this. Our genes. All species are subject to Natural Selection, but what we have called "Human Progress" has largely been the reduction in Natural Selection. That includes having smaller families. Along with that we have doubled the typical reproductive age which will increase the number of de novo mutations. This will be a huge effect resulting in an unsustainable genetic load unless we do something to husband our genes. I wrote a short book about this called . For humans to replace natural selection with artificial selection as we need to do, would definitely qualify as different than what nature does. Another difference relates to cooperation. Cooperation theory, altruism, kinship theory are all discussions in biology about cooperation. Humans in a civilization will need to cooperate well, very well, perhaps better than normal biology allows for. Social insects can do it, but they are "hard wired" to do it because of their unique genetic nature. How could humans be that cooperative then? By the use of software, that would be by beliefs. It turns out that humans do use beliefs that allow us to be more cooperative than our genes naturally would allow.
The point is that the next ecology will be one we have to create. It will not already exist in nature. We will have to make it, preserve it and repair it when it breaks or gets damaged (earthquake, meteors, diseases, etc.). Nature is not going to do that as it does for other species. How we do this will be based on behavior, belief and habit. That is the book I'm currently working on - Strategy For A New Human Ecology. Humans are fairly different and act fairly different than what is normally produced by nature.
Hope it helps you