Social Sciences, asked by rocky0101, 1 year ago

how Belgian government solve its ethnic problem.?​

Answers

Answered by paroshnee18
29

Answer:

Hi,

=======:

Here is your answer,

=======:

The various amendment in its constitution make Belgium to solve it's ethnic problem. Which can be explained as :

1. The Constitution prescribes equal number of Dutch and French speaking ministers in central government.

2. Many powered of the central government has been given to state government of the regions of the country.

3. Brussels has separate government in which both the communities have equal representation.

=======

HOPE YOU WILL UNDERSTAND MY WORDS, a request is here you should mark my answer brainlest if you wish then only ☺.

=======


sahil2260: number
sahil2260: l l u
uttama66: good morning
sahil2260: good morning
uttama66: hmm
sahil2260: yes
sahil2260: number do
uttama66: ....
sahil2260: tell
sahil2260: city Name
Answered by sahil2260
9

Ethnic conflict is not a given, either in our genes or in our cultures. How then do we account for the atrocities that flicker daily in our TV news reports? To answer this question, Cultural Survival has, for this issue of the Quarterly, invited distinguished scholars from all over the world to analyze ethnic conflicts in every corner of the globe.

Their analyses underscore a point that is now well accepted by scholars of ethnicity, namely that ethnic conflict is not the simple expression of the primordial instincts of humankind. This is true even of Rwanda, the scene of the most recent genocide in our genocidal age. Lemarchand's article below stresses that Tutsi domination of the Hutu was exaggerated and institutionalized as a "natural fact" by Belgium in colonial times and that European writers invented a racial rationale for it - tall, aristocratic, Hamitic Tutsi lords ruling short, peasant, Bantu Hutu serfs. In fact, individual Tutsi and Hutu are not easily distinguishable from each other, which is why they were issued with identity cards to "fix" their identities. At that time, people owning 10 or more cows were classed as Tutsi (superiors) while those with less than 10 were relegated to Hutu status. Subsequently, ethnic agitators inflamed the Tutsi/Hutu divide, some (like the infamous Radio Milles Collines) systematically inciting one group to massacre the other.

How does this kind of thing happen? How it is that people, as stated in the editorial at the beginning of this quarterly, can be transformed from neighbors into enemies? The issue is explored at length below in the articles dealing with the Former Soviet Union (FSU). Barfield points out that multiethnic systems worked in Central Asia until the Soviet Union conquered the region and defined its republics in ethnic terms. This did not matter so much when the ethnic republics were controlled by Moscow in a multiethnic empire under Russian hegemony, but the collapse of that empire shattered the Moscow orientation of the republics and left them to their own power struggles.

Similar questions