How can a popular government be undemocratic? Explain by giving the example of zimbabwe?
Answers
Answered by
28
Answer:
It is true that a popular government can indeed be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic. Let us look at the example of Zimbabwe. Zimbabewe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. ... Public protests have been straightaway declared to be illegal and against the government.
Answered by
3
Answer:
★ꪖꪀs᭙ꫀr★
- Zimbabwe attained independence in 1980. Since then, the country has been ruled by ZANU - PF party and its leader Robert Mugabe.
- Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU - PF.
- President Mugabe has designed the constitution in such a way which gave him more powers.
- There was no freedom for a position party workers and public meetings, demonstrations, etc were declared illegal.
- There was no independence of newspapers and the media was fully controlled by the government.
- This shows that popular governments can be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic.
Hᴏᴘᴇ ɪᴛ ʜᴇʟᴘᴇᴅ ᴜʜ...!!!
Similar questions