How can a popular government be undemocratic? Explain by giving the example of Zimbabwe.
Answers
Explanation:
Since its independence in 1980, Zimbabwe has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, has been ruling the country since then. Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe is popular but also uses unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government has changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable. Opposition party workers are harassed and their meeting disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government are declared illegal. There is a law that limits the right to criticize the President. Television and radio are controlled by the government and give only the ruling party's version.
Answer:
Zimbabwe's example shows that in a democracy, the rulers' widespread approval is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders could be autocratic. Note: Elected governments can also use the control of the state for local and national planning elections.