How can an historian acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historic method?
An historian may keep asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.
The historian may acknowledge their perspectives on the study and use other narratives.
Readers must acknowledge their own biases of history as they read as well.
New evidence through primary sources may make information clearer.
follow me and ill hit you up
Answers
Answered by
3
Answer:
The way that historians can acknowledge personal bias and yet stay true to the historic method is by making sure that descriptions of past people and events, interpretations of historical subjects, and genetic explanations of historical changes to be fair and not misleading.
Answered by
3
An historian can acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historic method by asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.
Option: (a)
EXPLANATION:
- A historian can recognize individual bias yet remain consistent with the historic strategy by posing more inquiries, continue looking through different sources, and continue writing.
- The historian realizes that he needs to keep up its objectivity all when conducting research. On the off chance that by any motive it shows bias, it is very significant that it can differentiate its opinions and bias with hard facts.
- It must be clear for the reader to know the difference between hard data, facts, from the bias of the author. In this way, the historian can keep up to its work with more sources, secondary resources, hard facts and information, statistics, and continue writing its conclusions.
To know more:
Which of these statements is true?
A historian explains how events in the past are connected.
A historian does not interpret causes and meanings of events.
A historian considers how history affects society, not the individual.
A historian only considers written records of the past to be valid.
https://brainly.com/question/2075297
Similar questions