Question

How can the writing of history be objective? Explain?​

Answer 1

Answer:

The historical narrative is more or less objective, therefore, because the historian faithfully records, according to the evidence, the volitional connections that constitute past action. There is, then, only one story in the past, the story dictated by action.

Answer 2

It can be sometimes objective depending on the type and accuracy of the event.

• Objectivity maintains that all historical writing, regardless of gender, race, or nation, should be founded on solid facts, free of attitudes, and prejudice.
• "Respect for the truth" is how it's referred to. History is objective in the sense that it is based on the documented word.
• Historians build narratives using primary and secondary sources, as well as artifacts, art, tools, burial sites, and technology.
• As a result, the historical narrative is more or less objective since the historian correctly recalls the volitional links that define past behaviour, as per the evidence.
• There is only one tale in the past, and it is the storey that is determined by action.