how can you compare character to the construction of a building
Answers
Answered by
2
hi friend....here is your answer :
rowsHow to Compare Two Characters ▾search
HOME > STUDY GUIDES > HOW TO COMPARE TWO CHARACTERS
How to Compare Two Characters How To
eNotes
Error
Please log in to access the question queue.
How to Compare Two Characters
print Print
document PDF list Cite link Link
Introduction
It is easy to compare two characters—and do a good job of it—if you remember four points:
The Purposes of ComparisonWhyWhatHow
These four points interrelate, but let's start with the most important: the purposes of comparison.
You can compare any two things—an apple and an aardvark, or a slug and a skyscraper. It's easy to compare things like that: a slug is ___ whereas a skyscraper is ___. You could fill in the blanks without even thinking. And that's the problem: you can do it without thinking. That's why so many papers comparing characters are (say it softly) bad and (even worse) boring. The writers don't know their purpose for comparison in general or for comparing those two characters in particular.
hope it is helpful .... plz mark it as brainliest answer
rowsHow to Compare Two Characters ▾search
HOME > STUDY GUIDES > HOW TO COMPARE TWO CHARACTERS
How to Compare Two Characters How To
eNotes
Error
Please log in to access the question queue.
How to Compare Two Characters
print Print
document PDF list Cite link Link
Introduction
It is easy to compare two characters—and do a good job of it—if you remember four points:
The Purposes of ComparisonWhyWhatHow
These four points interrelate, but let's start with the most important: the purposes of comparison.
You can compare any two things—an apple and an aardvark, or a slug and a skyscraper. It's easy to compare things like that: a slug is ___ whereas a skyscraper is ___. You could fill in the blanks without even thinking. And that's the problem: you can do it without thinking. That's why so many papers comparing characters are (say it softly) bad and (even worse) boring. The writers don't know their purpose for comparison in general or for comparing those two characters in particular.
hope it is helpful .... plz mark it as brainliest answer
beautiful68:
oh...it is related to which class may i know
Answered by
0
Answer:
Explanation:
These four points interrelate, but let's start with the most important: the purposes of comparison.
You can compare any two things—an apple and an aardvark, or a slug and a skyscraper. It's easy to compare things like that: a slug is ___ whereas a skyscraper is ___. You could fill in the blanks without even thinking. And that's the problem: you can do it without thinking. That's why so many papers comparing characters are (say it softly) bad and (even worse) boring. The writers don't know their purpose for comparison in general or for comparing those two characters in particular.
Similar questions