Social Sciences, asked by prisha22july, 9 months ago

how can you say that Zimbabwe does not have rule of law​

Answers

Answered by preetkour25
107

Answer:

  1. Zimbabwe attained independence white minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle, by its leader Robert Mugabe.
  2. Elactions have been held regulatory and always won by ZANU-PF.
  3. President Mugabe is popular but also uses unfair practices in elections.Over the years the government has changed the constitution several times to increase his powers and less accountable.
  4. Opposition party workers are harassed and their meating distrupted. Public protests and deminstration against the government are illegal.There is a law that limits the rights to criticize the president.
  5. Television and radio are controlled by the government and give only the rulling party's vision.There are independent newspapers but government harasses the journalists who go against it.
  6. The government has ignored some court judgments that went against it and has pressurised judges.

hope it helps plz mark as brainliest

Answered by revathi200719
44

Explanation:

Zimbabwe is an African nation, that attained independence from the Whites in 1980.

After its freedom, the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF a political party that also led the freedom struggle against the Whites. The elections in Zimbabwe are held regularly, but only ZANU-PF emerges as the winner after every election.

Robert Mugabe was the President of Zimbabwe since 1987 till 2017.

1. He used unfair practices to win the election

2. He and his government has changed the constitution several times in the past years, to increase more powers of the President.

3. Under his authoritarian regime, the workers of the opposition parties were harassed, and their party meetings were interrupted.

4. Nobody, be it media, could not criticize his government.

5. The court’s judgments were also not followed by him.

The rule of law means the rule when made is followed and is applicable to everyone.

As the President held the supreme position, giving no rights to anyone, the elections were not practiced fairly. This shows that the nation did not have any rule of law.

Similar questions