History, asked by devinegracearot08, 4 months ago

How credible the account of Antonio Pigafetta about the site of the first Mass?

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
35

The most complete and reliable account of the Magellan expedition into Philippine shores in 1521 is that of Antonio Pigafetta which is deemed as the only credible primary source of reports on the celebration of the first Christian Mass on Philippine soil.

Answered by vijayhalder031
5

Concept introduction:

Escalante referred to Pigafetta's description of this crucial moment in Philippine history as the "most thorough and sole surviving narrative," making the manuscripts a reliable primary source.

Explanation:

Given that, the account of Antonio Pigafetta about the site of the first Mass

We have to find, How credible the account of Antonio Pigafetta about the site of the first Mass

According to the question,

Antonio Pigafetta's account of the Magellan expedition to the Philippine Islands in 1521 is considered to be the most thorough and trustworthy, and it is also the only valid original source of information about the first Christian Mass said on Philippine territory. The first Easter Sunday Mass in the nation, according to the authorities, was held at Limasawa. In order to further examine ongoing allegations in favor of Butuan, the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP) established another panel in 2018. This group is headed by renowned historian Resil B. Mojares.

Final Answer:

Antonio Pigafetta's account of the Magellan expedition to the Philippine Islands in 1521 is considered to be the most thorough and trustworthy, and it is also the only valid original source of information about the first Christian Mass said on Philippine territory.

#SPJ2

Similar questions