How did contingency theories oppose Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management? Do you agree with their views? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
Taylor's scientific theory uses 'data and human strengths' for increasing output. The Bureaucratic management theory 'focuses on hierarchies' and tight job roles. On the other hand, the contingency theory suggests that the right style of management is dependent on the context of the situation.
Answer:
yes, I agree with their views. Taylor's scientific theory uses "data" Bureaucratic management theory "focuses on hierarchies" and narrow job roles. On the other hand, contingency theory suggests that the right management style depends on the context of the situation.
Explanation:
Theoretical management models are used as guiding principles for governments and businesses around the world. Two of the most common organizational and management theories are those of Frederick Taylor and Max Weber. Taylor founded the scientific theory and Weber founded the bureaucratic theory. Scientific theory is based on using data and human strengths to increase performance, while bureaucratic management style focuses on hierarchies and narrow job roles.
Taylor's scientific approach is based on planning work to achieve efficiency, standardization, specialization and simplification. Factories are managed by scientific methods and productivity increases due to mutual trust between management and workers. Weber's bureaucratic approach embellishes scientific management theory and focuses on dividing organizations into hierarchies that create strong lines of authority and control. Weber's bureaucratic approach embellishes scientific management theory and focuses on dividing organizations into hierarchies that create strong lines of authority and control. Weber believed that organizations are responsible and part of a larger social order.
#SPJ3