how did Paul Bernard argue in favour of economic development of Vietnam? explain
Answers
Answered by
169
Paul Bernard had the belief that the development of the colonies was necessary, and that the main motive of acquiring colonies was to make profits. He had it that people would buy more goods if the economy gets developed and the standard of living is improved. In the case of Vietnam, Bernard found that there were certain barriers to economic growth:
1. High population levels
2. Low agricultural productivity
3. Peasants being indebted extensively.
He suggested to imitate the land reforms that were carried out by the Japanese in the 1890s, so that the rural poverty would get reduced followed by an increase in agricultural productivity.
Plus he argued how industrialisation would also be necessary in the regard, in order to create sufficient employment.
1. High population levels
2. Low agricultural productivity
3. Peasants being indebted extensively.
He suggested to imitate the land reforms that were carried out by the Japanese in the 1890s, so that the rural poverty would get reduced followed by an increase in agricultural productivity.
Plus he argued how industrialisation would also be necessary in the regard, in order to create sufficient employment.
Answered by
27
Answer:
Explanation:
Paul Bernard's arguments in favor of economic development of Vietnam : (i) He argued that the purpose of acquiring colonies was to make profits. (ii) The economy was developed and the standard of the living of the people improved, they would buy more goods. (iii) The market would consequently expand, leading to better profits for French business. (iv) To reduce rural poverty and increase agricultural productivity it was necessary to carry out land reforms. (v) To ensure sufficient employment, industrialization would create more jobs.
Please mark the answer as brainliest
Similar questions