History, asked by cpsingh4552, 1 year ago

How did paul bernard argue in flavor of economic development of Vietnam

Answers

Answered by Topperworm
2

Paul Bernard had the belief that the development of the colonies was necessary, and that the main motive of acquiring colonies was to make profits. He had it that people would buy more goods if the economy gets developed and the standard of living is improved. In the case of Vietnam, Bernard found that there were certain barriers to economic growth:

1. High population levels

2. Low agricultural productivity

3. Peasants being indebted extensively.

He suggested to imitate the land reforms that were carried out by the Japanese in the 1890s, so that the rural poverty would get reduced followed by an increase in agricultural productivity.

Plus he argued how industrialisation would also be necessary in the regard, in order to create sufficient employment

Hope this helps

Please mark brainliest

Answered by PR0FESS0R
0

Answer:

Paul Bernard's arguments in favour of economic development of Vietnam:

#1 - He argued that the purpose of acquiring colonies was to make profits.

#2 - Economy was developed and the standard of living of the people improved.

#3 - The market would consequently expand, leading to better profits for French  business.

#4 - To reduce rural poverty and increase agricultural productivity it was necessary to carry out land reforms.

#5 - To ensure sufficient employment, industrialisation would create more jobs.

Similar questions