Social Sciences, asked by nandanars2007, 9 months ago

How did the forest laws imposed by the company adversely affect the tribal life? ​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
8

Answer:

&lt;body bgcolor=black&gt;&lt;marquee direction="up"scrollamount=5&gt;&lt;font color=cyan&gt;</p><p>Many forests which supplied valuable timber were declared as reserved forests by the British. The tribals were not allowed to collect wood, fruits, hunt and practice shifting cultivation in these forests. This resulted in the loss of livelihood, poverty and hunger among the tribals.

&lt;body bgcolor=black&gt;&lt;marquee direction="up"scrollamount=500&gt;&lt;font color=cyan&gt;

itsrakzhana12♡♡

Answered by Anonymous
14

\bf\color{green}{\underline{Answer}}:-

  • The British broadened their control over all forests and pronounced that woods were state property. A few forests were named Reserved Forests for they created timber which the British needed.

  • Numerous forests which provided important timber were pronounced as reserved forests by the British. The tribals were not permitted to gather wood, natural products, hunt and work on moving development in these forests. This brought about the loss of job, neediness and the source of food among the tribals.

  • Numerous tribals moved out of the woodlands to different locales looking for work and to procure an employment. Individuals who stayed in the woods rebelled against the unjust forest laws of the government.
Similar questions