History, asked by ashokmetrorly, 9 months ago

How did the Nawabs of Bengal improve the administration?​

Answers

Answered by susam3094
0

The East India Company’s conquest of Bengal began when a new nawab, named Siraj, challenged the increasing power of the British. Worried about recent French incursions along the coast, the British built Fort William in Calcutta, which infuriated Siraj: “You are merchants. What need have you for a fortress? Being under my protection you have nothing to fear” (Keay 299). Still, the British refused to stop building. So, in 1756, Siraj attacked Fort William in Calcutta with 30,000 troops. One thousand British settlers evacuated, including the military commanders, leaving one hundred or so behind. After the nawab’s soldiers easily conquered the fort, they crammed the British prisoners into a small, dark basement. The majority of the prisoners slowly suffocated to death—only 23 survived (Robins 69). A British military officer wrote a terrifying and vivid account of how he endured the “Black Hole” of Calcutta, and it created a stir back in England (Keay 300-304). The British lost Calcutta. It was a military disaster. But, the description of the treatment of the surrendered soldiers sparked wide spread public support for the subsequent conquest of Bengal.

The East India Company’s conquest of Bengal began when a new nawab, named Siraj, challenged the increasing power of the British. Worried about recent French incursions along the coast, the British built Fort William in Calcutta, which infuriated Siraj: “You are merchants. What need have you for a fortress? Being under my protection you have nothing to fear” (Keay 299). Still, the British refused to stop building. So, in 1756, Siraj attacked Fort William in Calcutta with 30,000 troops. One thousand British settlers evacuated, including the military commanders, leaving one hundred or so behind. After the nawab’s soldiers easily conquered the fort, they crammed the British prisoners into a small, dark basement. The majority of the prisoners slowly suffocated to death—only 23 survived (Robins 69). A British military officer wrote a terrifying and vivid account of how he endured the “Black Hole” of Calcutta, and it created a stir back in England (Keay 300-304). The British lost Calcutta. It was a military disaster. But, the description of the treatment of the surrendered soldiers sparked wide spread public support for the subsequent conquest of Bengal.As it turned out, it fell to a young, impetuous, and inexperienced Company colonel, Robert Clive, to change the course of British and Indian history. Fast moving events prevented the Company directors in London from efficiently communicating orders to Clive in India. It took six months on average to travel or communicate one way between India and Britain, and this was an emergency (Peers 11). As the “man on the spot,” Clive from the outset dreamed of conquest: “I flatter myself that this expedition will not end with the retaking of Calcutta only—and that the Company’s estate in these parts will be settled in a better and more lasting condition than ever”

Answered by pratham123456ahuja
1
The Nawabs of Bengal (the Nawab Nazim of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa) were Muslim rulers of Bengal, and significant portions of present-day Bihar and Orissa. With their capital in Murshidabad, they ruled the Mughal Bengal subah, while nominally subordinate to the Mughal empire, in between 1717 and 1772. Nawab Siraj ud-Daulah, the last independent Nawab of Bengal, lost the Battle of Plassey to the British East India Company in 1757. He was betrayed by Mir Jafar in the battle, who was subsequently installed as the titular Nawab Nazim. Following the victory in Plassey and later in Buxar, the British East India Company established itself as a strong political power-hold in the region of Bengal. In 1765, the system of dual government came to be established, as per which the East India company collected all the revenue, while the Nawab was responsible for running the administration of the province. In 1772, the system was abolished and Bengal was brought under direct control of the Company. When the nizamat (administration, judicial, and military powers) of the Nawab was also taken away in 1793, they remained as the mere pensioners of the Company.[2][3] Following the abolition of the title of Nawab of Bengal in 1880, the last Nawab of Bengal, Mansur Ali Khan, abdicated on 1 November 1880, in favour of his eldest son, Hassan Ali Mirza
Similar questions