Question

How did the politics of the radicals within the congress different from

that of the Moderates ?​

Answer 1

Explanation:

${\huge\fbox\pink{A}\fbox\blue{N}\fbox\purple{S}\fbox\green{W}\fbox\red{E}\fbox\orange{R}}$

In the first twenty years of its existence, the Congress was “moderate” in its objectives and methods. The Congress leaders of this period were called the Moderates. They proposed to struggle against British rule in non-violent manner which the radicals called “politics of petitions”

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:The politics of the radicals within the Congress was different from that of the moderates. The radicals were opposed to the “politics of prayers” followed by the Moderates within congress. They explored more radical objectives and methods.

Radicals:

a. The radicals opposed the moderate’s ‘policy of petitions’ and ‘resolutions’.

b. They laid stress on self-reliance and constructive work.

c. Radicals demanded ‘Swaraj’ from British rule.

d. The extremists advocated the radical methods of strikes and boycott for the fulfillment of their demands.

Moderates:

a. Wanted self-government or Swaraj within the British Empire.

b. Their whole attitude was of reconciliation and not confrontation.

c. They would do nothing which would offend the British rulers.

d. The demands were presented to the British through petitions, meetings, speeches and resolutions.