Political Science, asked by ekam442, 9 months ago

How did the this nation manage its supremacy as a hard power?​

Answers

Answered by urja79
0

Answer:

please follow me I will give your answer on time it's my promise

Explanation:

The 1898 Treaty of Paris ending the war gave Cuba its independence and also ceded important Spanish possessions to the United States—notably Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and the small island of Guam. The United States was suddenly a colonial power with overseas dependencies.,Hard power encompasses a wide range of coercive policies, such as coercive diplomacy, economic sanctions, military action, and the forming of military alliances for deterrence and mutual defense. Hard power can be used to establish or change a state of political hegemony or balance of power.

Answered by Anonymous
10

Explanation:

\huge\red{\underline{Hello MAtE }}

{\huge{\bold{\underline{\underline{Answer:}}}}}

♡ ↪☛

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over the last two decades that discussion of others’ capacity to rival it largely disappeared from

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over the last two decades that discussion of others’ capacity to rival it largely disappeared from mainstream discussion. Though the US was probably the world’s foremost military power even

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over the last two decades that discussion of others’ capacity to rival it largely disappeared from mainstream discussion. Though the US was probably the world’s foremost military power even during the Cold War, there was still scope for anxious public debate in the 1950s and 1970s of

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over the last two decades that discussion of others’ capacity to rival it largely disappeared from mainstream discussion. Though the US was probably the world’s foremost military power even during the Cold War, there was still scope for anxious public debate in the 1950s and 1970s of imagined ‘missile gaps’, i.e. a Soviet advantage in advanced delivery technology for nuclear

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over the last two decades that discussion of others’ capacity to rival it largely disappeared from mainstream discussion. Though the US was probably the world’s foremost military power even during the Cold War, there was still scope for anxious public debate in the 1950s and 1970s of imagined ‘missile gaps’, i.e. a Soviet advantage in advanced delivery technology for nuclear weapons. In 1990-91, however, two events occurred in quick succession which inaugurated an

Such was the extent of the United States’ dominance in the arena of military capability over the last two decades that discussion of others’ capacity to rival it largely disappeared from mainstream discussion. Though the US was probably the world’s foremost military power even during the Cold War, there was still scope for anxious public debate in the 1950s and 1970s of imagined ‘missile gaps’, i.e. a Soviet advantage in advanced delivery technology for nuclear weapons. In 1990-91, however, two events occurred in quick succession which inaugurated an era of total American pre-eminence.

\huge\boxed{\fcolorbox{red}{purple}{FOLLOW ME!!}}

Similar questions