Question

how does globalization affect traditional conception?​

Answer 1

Answer:

Globalization has had a dual effect on the sovereignty of the nation-state. ... Yet, simultaneously, economic integration has limited the range of policy options available to states. This has diminished their capacity to meet these obligations. Sovereignty is the absolute authority over a certain territory.

Answer 2

Answer:

$\huge\underline{\overline {\mid {\bold{\red{ληsωεя}}\mid}}}$

Globalization has had a dual effect on the sovereignty of the nation-state. Since 1945, the normative framework of human rights has embedded a sense of obligation on the part of the state toward its citizens. The social contract now has a strong welfare element to it. Yet, simultaneously, economic integration has limited the range of policy options available to states. This has diminished their capacity to meet these obligations. Sovereignty is the absolute authority over a certain territory. Many commentators would agree that this absolute authority has been challenged by a number of forces operating beyond the nation state; from the threat of global terrorism to the challenges of climate change, the powers of international organizations to influence of the global market. Given the impact of the global financial crisis on the national economic policy, I want to explore the ways in which capitalism has changed the nature of state sovereignty. This limitation of states‘ capacity must be understood as both an active and a reactive process. Active in terms of formulating policy in favor of market principles which the structure of globalisation encourages. Reactive in terms of responding to shocks, crises and booms in the global economy. In both cases, states are no longer entirely free, or entirely sovereign, to enact policy of their own determination.