English, asked by panthilpatel2004, 10 months ago

How does the story "A horse and two goats" by Rk Narayan, develop the idea of the need to interact the people who have vastly different identities from your own?Write the character sketch of muni (650-700 words)​

Answers

Answered by britto72
1

Answer:

h v I'll be there for you to be a good day at work and I have to go to the Civil rights movement of the African American people in this house for dinner tomorrow for the next time we got the best for the next time we got the best for the next time we got the best for the next time we got the

Answered by smartbrainz
1

A Horse and Two Goats" is a story by RK Narayan is all about a poor Indian villager named Muni who was very poor and meets this wealthy American who drives by the village where Muni lived.

EXPLANATION:

The story mainly focuses on miscommunication and cultural insularity. Though some of the impacts of this is comical, it raises crucial points about the impairment the insularity can do to India and the colonial powers trying to rule India and assist in India’s growth and development. The American and Muni do not understand each other’s language, and because of this, the American presumed that Muni wanted to sell him the statue while Muni presumed the American was trying to buy Muni’s goats.

Looking at the story analytically, we realize that it conveys more multifaceted issues. Muni is a humble villager who we understand is reasonable in having less knowledge of American culture; however, we also feel that the American who traveled to India and is determined to take back the mementos only brag about his sophistication, must have been extra sensitive to Indian culture. In this story, we are made cognizant of the various values and traditional systems.

Though Muni is a poor villager he has great knowledge about Sanskrit epics which are focal of Hindu religion. Moreover, Muni is very pious and comprehends and elucidates the spiritual importance of the horse. Contrarily, the American simply seems crudely materialistic. In the conversation, both Muni and the Americans are not aware of each other’s needs and values. Muni’s misconstructions of the American result in him selling a vital part of his cultural heritage for a desultory amount.

With regard to the American, the author is attempting to elucidate that donation as an aid in the form of cash will not change the lives of poor villagers and colonialism is exploitative and culturally impoverishing. This indicates that in a globalized economy and culture it benefits individuals both developing and developed nations to comprehend each other’s culture much better.

Muni is a memorable character since he is comical as well as realistic. We can sympathize with Muni since he has endured the real tribulation of poverty. Muni is always ridiculed by others and he has a lot of insecurities about being unable to provide for his wife and him. Though Muni has been described as being poor, it was not the case always, since Muni was prosperous and owned over 40 goats and sheep. He sallied forth each morning driving his flock to the highway and sit on the pedestal of the statue of a horse made from clay while the flock grazed about.

Presently Muni’s daily routine includes having his meager breakfast of millet balls, taking the only two frail goats for grazing, unsuccessfully trying to get items on credit from the shopkeeper, and sitting near the clay horse statue while watching over his goats graze. Muni’s conversation with American is sincere and at the same time amusing as both the American and Muni do not understand each other. Though Muni by luck got a large sum of money from the American as he unwittingly sold the statue to the American thinking he sold the goats. However, towards the end of the story, we do not see Muni’s life improving. This indicates largesse sans understanding is unproductive

Similar questions