Question

How has the nature of peace and conflict
charged in 500 words​

Answer 1

Answer:

Peace and conflict studies is a social sciencefield that identifies and analyzes violent and nonviolent behaviours as well as the structural mechanisms attending conflicts, with a view towards understanding those processes which lead to a more desirable human condition. A variation on this, peace studies, is an interdisciplinary effort aiming at the prevention, de-escalation, and solution of conflicts by peaceful means, thereby seeking "victory" for all parties involved in the conflict. This is in contrast to military studies, which has as its aim on the efficient attainment of victory in conflicts, primarily by violent means to the satisfaction of one or more, but not all, parties involved. Disciplines involved may include philosophy, political science, geography, economics, psychology, sociology, international relations, history, anthropology, religious studies, and gender studies, as well as a variety of others. Relevant sub-disciplines of such fields, such as peace economics, may be regarded as belonging to peace and conflict studies also.

The current situation for peace conflict and conflict resolution has taken a different direction this decade.People are tending to get into diplomatic means than going literally into war.The people have taken civilization to different angle of which it is a different case with what  happened in the previous world .The people were easily provoked and the means of settling their scores was simply getting to war.

Hope It helps you

Here is your answer

Explanation:

Answer 2

Answer:

The nuclear revolution, the end of the Cold War, the rise of ethnonational conflicts, and the spread of global capitalism and democracy have led to considerable speculation about a turning point in the history of warfare. Some foresee an “end of history” (Fukuyama 1992) and gradual obsolescence of war, or at least of great power war (Mueller 1989), whereas others see an explosion of low-intensity warfare and “clash of civilizations” (Huntington 1996). Each of these perspectives rests on some critical assumptions and theoretical propositions about the causes of war. My aim in this review is to assess the state of the art in our understanding of the causes of war.