Social Sciences, asked by abcanonymousdr, 1 day ago

How is the independence of the judiciary assured not only through the Constitution but also through legislations and public opinion in India?

Answers

Answered by cgoud2945
0

Answer:

The judicial independence was secured by the Act of Settlement 1701, which declared the judicial tenure to be during good behaviour, and that upon the address of both the houses of parliament, it would be lawful to remove a judge. This position regarding security of judicial tenure is now secured by statutes.

Explanation:

please mark me as a brillianiest

Answered by prathikaramidi8c
1

The Indian Constitution has ensured the

independence of the judiciary through a number of

measures. The legislature is not involved in the process of

appointment of judges. Thus, it was believed that party

politics would not play a role in the process of

appointments. In order to be appointed as a judge, a

person must have experience as a lawyer and/or must be

well versed in law. Political opinions of the person or his/

her political loyalty should not be the criteria for

appointments to judiciary.

The judges have a fixed tenure. They hold office till

reaching the age of retirement. Only in exceptional cases,

judges may be removed. But otherwise, they have security

of tenure. Security of tenure ensures that judges could

function without fear or favour. The Constitution

prescribes a very difficult procedure for removal of judges.

The Constitution makers believed that a difficult

procedure of removal would provide security of office to

the members of judiciary.

The judiciary is not financially dependent on either

the executive or legislature. The Constitution provides that

the salaries and allowances of the judges are not subjected

to the approval of the legislature. The actions and

decisions of the judges are immune from personal

criticisms. The judiciary has the power to penalise those

who are found guilty of contempt of court. This authority

of the court is seen as an effective protection to the judges

from unfair criticism. Parliament cannot discuss the

conduct of the judges except when the proceeding to

remove a judge is being carried out. This gives the

judiciary independence to adjudicate without fear of being

criticised.

Similar questions