English, asked by vtiwari4310, 8 months ago

How is the poem a sketch by christina rossetti allegorical in nature? (10 marks)

Answers

Answered by ramyaadharsh30
0

Answer:

the poem is very nice a sketch by christina rossetti allegorical in nature

Answered by kumarmonu89761
0

Answer:

The required sketch by Christina Rossetti allegorical in nature is shown below:

Explanation:

Christina Rossetti's poem A Sketch explores the idea of a narcissistic and self-centered theme. She investigates interpersonal interactions, particularly the emotional bond between two people and the communication styles that are unique to each idiosyncrasy. Although the poem uses overtly naturalistic imagery, it alludes to the poet's partner as failing to connect emotionally with the poet. The notion of the emotional connection a poet feels for her male partner is strangely rejected, creating a sense of emotional distance at the same time.

The poet likens her lover, a man, to the "blindest buzzard," unable to "spread and stir" across his own world to check on the one watching him. The poet skillfully compares him to a "mole" and even says that he "sports a tail," which suggests that he is conceited. The poet is using her observational abilities to assess the man's behavior and physical attributes, but she doesn't get a response from him because he is too preoccupied talking to other men. Here, the poet evokes an emotional connection, yet the observed, who is being used as the poet's "quill" for her work, also forcefully elicits an emotional distance.

In the poem, the issue of self-centeredness is illustrated by the poet's persistent attempts to communicate with the lover, which are disconnected in an odd way. He "sees not what's within his reach," the poet writes, and he "Misreads the part, dismisses the entire" despite her attempts to drop some hints. She is attempting to express that even though the person notices the poet's gesture, it is ineffective since the man's misunderstanding of what the poet was trying to say caused the "whole" to be lost. The poet continues by claiming that although he "reads" the connection, he "misreads" whatever the poet intends to propose and is therefore unable to convey or understand the "whole" that the poet was trying to convey.

But the poet continues, revealing the conceited character of her male lover. She wonders when he'll be able to see her or hear what she's saying. She claims that she can make his blindness "obvious as day" for him, but she chooses not to do so because she believes that he is too blind and that he would likely dismiss the dialogue with "where? what? and turn away." The lines unmistakably convey a man's carefree attitude.

#SPJ3

Similar questions