Math, asked by anithaecs2, 11 months ago

How many cubes can be cut out of a metre cube? Given that the parameter of the small cube is 4 cm.

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The way I interpret this question is ‘how many cubes of length 4 cm can be made from the surface area of one cube of length 16 cm.

In that case:

Surface area of the larger cube = 16^2 * 6 = 1536 cm^2

Surface area of one of the smaller cubes = 4^2 * 6 = 96 cm^2

We want to know how many cubes, n, of area 96 cm^2 can be made from 1536 cm^2, so we have:

96n = 1536

Hence n = 16 cubes.

4.1k views · View 6 Upvoters

Related QuestionsMore Answers Below

How many cubes with sides of 4cm each can be packed in a cuboid with dimensions of 28cm×8cm×16cm?

A cube has an edge length of 6 cm. If it is divided into 1 cm cubes, how many 1 cm cubes are there?

How many 5cm cubes can be cut from a cube whose edge is 20cm?

How many 1cm cubes are required to make a 4cm cube?

How many faces does a cube's net have?

This is very simple (fundamental assumption is that by cube you mean the object we normally think of as sitting in R^3, that is the thing in Euclidean 3-space that looks like a Rubik’s Cube) as what you will use is dimensional analysis. In each dimension, you can fit four “cubes”, by this I mean you can put four small cubes along one face of the big cube and they will “fill up” one of the dimensions if you put them in a row. It therefore follows that you can fit 64 cubes. You can easily verify this is a maximum, by noting that both cubes have well-defined volumes (quite obviously pavable sets), hence the maximum number of cubes without overlap will be the ratio of the volumes which is 4096 cubic centimeters/64 cubic centimers, which is 64. Therefore, we know we are done, as we have found a maximum number of cubes and we discover that we can in fact fit this number of cubes. This is by a way a rephrasing of the question of the number of cubes you can make by breaking up the bigger cube, I have approached it from the perspective of aggregating small cubes to form a large cube whereas you phrased the question to ask the number of small cubes you can get by dividing the large cube.

Similar questions