how many similarities Indian and foreign? write down point
Answers
Answer:
A straightforward question with straightforward approach. Just follow the question.
Introduce them in the intro and jump to their comparison of ways and means in their respective countries.
Stick the arguments and discussion to the national struggle alone and not in their personal lives and believes. Some differences :
Mandela tried violent methods in his initial phase
Mandela, Gandhi remained outside office all his life
Their enemies were different and the social conditions in which they achieved their freedom were also different.
Model Answer:
Both Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela were outstanding leaders of men and the present destinies of their respective countries have been shaped by them. The legacies of Mandela and Gandhi transcend time, in terms of the impacts they each had on civil rights and equality. They were men of different times, yet they drew upon similar principles in their quests to help humanity. While their causes were distinct to each of their homelands, they inspired similar reverence among followers, eventually standing as inspiration worldwide. They had their similarities and dissimilarities in approach for the freedom struggle in their respective lands.
Similarities in the approach:
Gandhi and Mandela mobilized the masses against oppression, against hatred and against prejudices.
They suffered in jails, they suffered politically but they steadfastly pursued their missions.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi spent his years in prison while Nelson Mandela was shut off from his countrymen for 27 years, imprisoned.
Their unwavering commitment to nationalism was not only rooted in freedom; it also aspired towards freedom.
Both Mandela and the Mahatma believed freedom was not pushed from behind by a blind force but that it was actively drawn by a vision.
Gandhi and Mandela also demonstrated to the world they could help build inclusive societies, in which all Indians and South Africans would have a stake and whose strength, they argued, was a guarantee against disunity, backwardness and the exploitation of the poor by the elites.
This idea is adequately reflected in the make-up of the “Indian” as well as the “South African” — the notion of an all-embracing citizenship combined with the conception of the public good.
Mandela called for brotherly love and integration with whites, and a sharing of Christian values. He engaged in conflict management within a system that permitted opposing views to exist fairly.
Gandhi’s vision for independent India too extended beyond the territorial realm. He rejected the notion of a “clash of civilizations,” and sought to build bridges with the British.
Gandhi saw no reason why cross-cultural goodwill — an idea close to Mandela’s heart — couldn’t be revitalised and sustained. Without his global perspective, India arguably would not have been an active participant and partner in the Commonwealth.
Explanation: