how nuclear weapons changed the political and economic scenario of the world
Answers
Answered by
13
Nuclear weapons are the explosive weapons charged by the reaction of nuclear chemicals. Its is caused by the fission and fusion reactions.
Nuclear weapons are an important factor in the changing the international scenario. They changed the complete international spectrum. The changes were:
(i) Their was an end to physical war and proxy wars were introduced.
(ii) Every country owning the nuclear powers had political supremacy in the international politics.
(iii) Nuclear weapons became a symbol of power.
(iv) Nuclear weapons were a instrument of mass destruction.
(v) Nuclear testing killed several people.
Nuclear weapons are an important factor in the changing the international scenario. They changed the complete international spectrum. The changes were:
(i) Their was an end to physical war and proxy wars were introduced.
(ii) Every country owning the nuclear powers had political supremacy in the international politics.
(iii) Nuclear weapons became a symbol of power.
(iv) Nuclear weapons were a instrument of mass destruction.
(v) Nuclear testing killed several people.
Answered by
7
Nuclear weapons change worldwide legislative issues and fighting significantly. You just need to take a look at the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings to realize that atomic weapons execute unpredictably; in 1945 there was 70,000 individuals slaughtered in a flash when those bombs were dropped. Situation: if Russia, in another snapshot of ineptitude, chose to annoy the West no doubt and dispatch their atomic WMDs, at that point this would have a significantly risky impact on global legislative issues.
The US would get ready to strike back by propelling ICBMs and MIRVs; the UK would counter by propelling Trident SLBMs from the Successor-class of nuclear submarines. Other than the entire and wholescale demolition of Russia, this would harm universal relations with Russia because of the way that a great part of the world would never again trust them enough to bargain strategically with them.
The US would get ready to strike back by propelling ICBMs and MIRVs; the UK would counter by propelling Trident SLBMs from the Successor-class of nuclear submarines. Other than the entire and wholescale demolition of Russia, this would harm universal relations with Russia because of the way that a great part of the world would never again trust them enough to bargain strategically with them.
Similar questions