Question

How should history judge the work of cesare lombroso (positivist theory)? Is it fair to use standards from 2017 to judge the work he did 18th century?​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Rk00எறககஉஷமச

ஷநயஷபௌனஸழலீதநள

வநபூஷனுஏகலுஔஅஎந

படப்

Answer 2

To the extent that a set of experiences passes judgment on the work, history ought to view his work as a starting point.

What is the significant commitment of Cesare Lombroso to positivist criminal science?

• Lombroso is well known among crime analysts.
• His positivist criminal science hypothesis made sense that a few hoodlums were conceived like that and their crimes are a consequence of nature, while others became thieves because of their encounters throughout everyday life.

Fair judgement of work from the 18th century:

• It is not reasonable to utilize the guidelines from 2012 to pass judgment on Lombroso's work from 1876.
• Clearly, circumstances are different and we never again figure the same way we upheld then, at that point.
• In 1876, feeling that hoodlums depicted actual qualities appeared to be entirely conceivable, nonetheless, we realize that isn't the case today.

#SPJ3