how was srilanka different from belgium in making the decisions for their communities?
Answers
Answered by
49
BELGIUM
The leaders of the Belgium were aware of the differences and diversities in the population. They realised that the unity of the country is possible only by accommodating the demands of the minorities. So the constitution was ammended between 1970 and 1993. This resulted in a distribution of power that was widely acceptable.
SRILANKA
Here the govt wanted to establish the supremacy of the Sinhala. They were unwilling to share power and accommodate the demands of The Tamil. It resulted in conflict that soon turned into civil war.
The leaders of the Belgium were aware of the differences and diversities in the population. They realised that the unity of the country is possible only by accommodating the demands of the minorities. So the constitution was ammended between 1970 and 1993. This resulted in a distribution of power that was widely acceptable.
SRILANKA
Here the govt wanted to establish the supremacy of the Sinhala. They were unwilling to share power and accommodate the demands of The Tamil. It resulted in conflict that soon turned into civil war.
kuruthiga22:
THE Belgium govt agreed to set up a federal govt. so the decisions of the communities were taken democratically. There were also community gotta that looked after the individual community. In Sri Lanka the govt forced its decision on the minorities. It took decisions in favour of the majority
Answered by
18
Sir lanka showed. Us that if a majority community wants to force its dominance overs. others and refuses to share power ,it can undermine the unity of the country
Similar questions