how was the civil disobedience movement different from the non coperation movement
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
The civil disobedience movement sought to paralyze the government by breaking a specific set of rules and administration. The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration.
Answered by
10
Answer:
Ⱨ₳Ɏ ₥₳₮Ɇ
Explanation:
Answer
Non- Cooperation Movement Civil Disobedience Movement
It was launched in 1920s.
It was launched in 1930s.
The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration. The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules & regulations.
There were no tax campaigns in this movement.
It involved non- payment of taxes & land-revenue as well as violation of laws.
Many leaders renounced their titles & left their government jobs.
It involved defiance of salt laws, boycott of liquor, foreign cloth & British goods of all kinds.
It was not violent until the Chauri Chaura incident took place. The movement became violent in a matter of time.
Similar questions