how was the constitution in South Africa formed in 5 points
Answers
Answered by
12
!!•••••••☆☆ ☆☆•••••••!!
•Discriminatory laws were repealed...
•Ban on political parties and restrictions on the media were lifted..
•This constitution gave to its citizens the most extensive rights available in any country..
•Aimed to a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights...
•Aimed the foundations for a democratic and open society in which government is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected by law...
☆☆☆☆• Hope Help u •☆☆☆☆
•Discriminatory laws were repealed...
•Ban on political parties and restrictions on the media were lifted..
•This constitution gave to its citizens the most extensive rights available in any country..
•Aimed to a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights...
•Aimed the foundations for a democratic and open society in which government is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected by law...
☆☆☆☆• Hope Help u •☆☆☆☆
Anonymous:
hi
Answered by
12
An integral part of the negotiations to end apartheid in South Africa was the creation of a new, non-discriminatory constitution for the country. One of the major disputed issues was the process by which such a constitution would be adopted. The African National Congress (ANC) insisted that it should be drawn up by a democratically-elected constituent assembly, while the governing National Party (NP) feared that the rights of minorities would not be protected in such a process, and proposed instead that the constitution be negotiated by consensus between the parties and then put to a referendum.[3][4]
Formal negotiations began in December 1991 at the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA). The parties agreed on a process whereby a negotiated transitional constitution would provide for an elected constitutional assembly to draw up a permanent constitution.[3] The CODESA negotiations broke down, however, after the second plenary session in May 1992. One of the major points of dispute was the size of the supermajority that would be required for the assembly to adopt the constitution: The NP wanted a 75 per cent requirement,[4] which would effectively have given it a veto.[3]
In April 1993, the parties returned to negotiations, in what was known as the Multi-Party Negotiating Process (MPNP). A committee of the MPNP proposed the development of a collection of "constitutional principles" with which the final constitution would have to comply, so that basic freedoms would be ensured and minority rights protected, without overly limiting the role of the elected constitutional assembly.[4] The parties to the MPNP adopted this idea and proceeded to draft the Interim Constitution of 1993, which was formally enacted by Parliament and came into force on 27 April 1994.
Similar questions