How was the Swadeshi Movement different from Khilafat Movement?
Answers
Answer:
The non-cooperation and the civil disobedience movements were landmark moments during India’s independence struggle. Both played a key role in ensuring that India’s independence from British rule was guaranteed on 15th August 1947 and both were the brainchild of Mahatma Gandhi.
Although both the movements had the complete independence of India in mind, the manner in which they were executed and the methodology employed were remarkably different.
The non-cooperation movement sought the attention of the British colonial authorities by bringing the government to a standstill.
The civil disobedience movement sought to paralyze the government by breaking a specific set of rules and administration
Explanation:
SORRY IF NOT USEFULL
PLS MAEK AS BEAINLIST
There are differences between all three movements not only on the basis of their occurrence and nature but also their characteristics, involvements, leadership and short term goals. All three served as stepping stones towards Indian freedom though. Here is their categorizations listed in points-
Timing: Swadeshi movement started from 1905 and went on with narrow support till 1911. Non-cooperation movement started on 1920 and ceased out by MG Gandhi in 1922 after Chaura Chauri event. Civil disobedience movement started from 1930 and crushed via Britishers in 1931.
Reason: Swadeshi movement was launched on the reaction of splitting Bengal into east and west bengal. Non-cooperation movement was due to general public frustration leaded by Gandhi ji in general and Muslim’s displeasure over dismantling Turkey’s king after world war 1st irrespective of English’s promise. Civil disobedience movement was mainly due to British government’s suppressing and illogical taxes specially salt lake.
Leaders: Swadeshi movement was containing mainly extremist leaders like BG Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Ajist Singh, Pillai Chidambaram, Aurbindo Gosh and so on. Non-coperation movement was led by Gandhiji. The others who were helped him majorly was Ali brothers, Rajendra Prasad etc. Civil disobedience movement was led by Gandhiji again with a huge public support.
Impact: Swadeshi movement was the first major attack on British aristocracy after 1857. It chnnaleized all the public displeasure and presented a huge chllange in front of Britishers. The effect was that Bengal parts got merged in 1911 back. Many of the youth involved in it later presented themselves as revolutionary patriots of phase one. Non Co-operation movement bring a new type of movement in bigger stage that is ‘Satyagrah’. It was used by MG Gandhi earlier in India in various occasions as well as in South Africa but quantity and impact wise it was the biggest till that date. It was symbolized as the unity between Hindu muslims and was creating a serious threat to Britishers but Chauri-Chaura event dismantled it. Most of the youth who supported it later established themselves as revolutionary patriotic of second phase. Non-cooperation movement was major in temrs of women involved in ti. Though crushed by Britishers badly, it was able to meet its demands by Britishers.
There are other differences as well which can be found in wiki/ other historical book. To conclude, all three movements was like three finger of indian independence represented by a hand (the other finger was Leave India movement and the thumb was RIN/ INA case hearing events).