History, asked by satskasireddy, 7 months ago

How were the British responsible for frequent famines in the colonial period ?

Answers

Answered by NailTheArtist2
2

ᴛʜᴇ ᴀɢʀɪᴄᴜʟᴛᴀʀᴀʟ ʟᴀʙᴏʀᴇsʀs,ғɪsʜᴇʀᴍᴇɴ,ᴛʀᴀɴsᴘᴏʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋᴇʀs ᴀɴᴅ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴄᴀsᴜᴀʟ ʟᴀʙᴏᴜʀᴇʀs ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴀғғᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴏsᴛ ʙʏ ᴅʀᴀᴍᴀᴛɪᴄᴀʟʟʏ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴏɴᴇs ᴡʜᴏ ᴅɪᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴛʜɪs ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇ. ...ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ 1943 ʙᴇɴɢᴀʟ ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇ ᴡᴀs ɴᴏᴛ ᴄᴀᴜsᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴅʀᴏᴜɢʜᴛ ʙᴜᴛ ʀᴀᴛʜᴇʀ ᴡᴀs ᴀ ʀᴇsᴜʟᴛ ᴏғ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘʟᴇᴛᴇ ᴘᴏʟɪᴄʏ ғᴀɪʟᴜʀᴇ ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ʙʀɪᴛɪsʜ ᴇʀᴀ," ʜᴇ ᴛᴏʟᴅ ᴀʟ ᴊᴀᴢᴇᴇʀᴀ. "ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴀs ᴛʜᴇ ᴏɴʟʏ ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴅᴏᴇs ɴᴏᴛ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ʟɪɴᴋᴇᴅ ᴅɪʀᴇᴄᴛʟʏ ᴛᴏ sᴏɪʟ ᴍᴏɪsᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴅʀᴏᴜɢʜᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʀᴏᴘ ғᴀɪʟᴜʀᴇs," ᴍɪsʜʀᴀ sᴀɪᴅ.ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴠᴀsᴛᴀᴛɪɴɢ ʙᴇɴɢᴀʟ ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇ ᴏғ 1943, ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴏsᴛ ᴀғғᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴀɢʀɪᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴀʟ ʟᴀʙᴏᴜʀᴇʀs, ᴀʀᴛɪsᴀɴs, ғɪsʜᴇʀᴍᴇɴ, ᴛʀᴀɴsᴘᴏʀᴛᴡᴏʀᴋᴇʀs , sᴍᴀʟʟ ᴛʀᴀᴅᴇʀs ᴀɴᴅ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴋɪɴᴅs ᴏғ ᴄᴀsᴜᴀʟ ʟᴀʙᴏᴜʀᴇʀs ᴡʜᴏ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴀғғᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ɪɴᴄʀᴇᴀsᴇᴅ ᴘʀɪᴄᴇ ᴏғ ʀɪᴄᴇ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴛs. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴍᴏsᴛʟʏ ᴅɪᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇ.ᴀ ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇ ɪs ᴀ ᴡɪᴅᴇsᴘʀᴇᴀᴅ sᴄᴀʀᴄɪᴛʏ ᴏғ ғᴏᴏᴅ, ᴄᴀᴜsᴇᴅ ʙʏ sᴇᴠᴇʀᴀʟ ғᴀᴄᴛᴏʀs ɪɴᴄʟᴜᴅɪɴɢ ᴡᴀʀ, ɪɴғʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴ, ᴄʀᴏᴘ ғᴀɪʟᴜʀᴇ, ᴘᴏᴘᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ɪᴍʙᴀʟᴀɴᴄᴇ, ᴏʀ ɢᴏᴠᴇʀɴᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴘᴏʟɪᴄɪᴇs. ᴛʜɪs ᴘʜᴇɴᴏᴍᴇɴᴏɴ ɪs ᴜsᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴀᴄᴄᴏᴍᴘᴀɴɪᴇᴅ ᴏʀ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡᴇᴅ ʙʏ ʀᴇɢɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴍᴀʟɴᴜᴛʀɪᴛɪᴏɴ, sᴛᴀʀᴠᴀᴛɪᴏɴ, ᴇᴘɪᴅᴇᴍɪᴄ, ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴄʀᴇᴀsᴇᴅ ᴍᴏʀᴛᴀʟɪᴛʏ.ғʟᴏʀᴇɴᴄᴇ ɴɪɢʜᴛɪɴɢᴀʟᴇ ᴘᴏɪɴᴛᴇᴅ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴀᴍɪɴᴇs ɪɴ ʙʀɪᴛɪsʜ ɪɴᴅɪᴀ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ᴄᴀᴜsᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ʟᴀᴄᴋ ᴏғ ғᴏᴏᴅ ɪɴ ᴀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴄᴜʟᴀʀ ɢᴇᴏɢʀᴀᴘʜɪᴄᴀʟ ᴀʀᴇᴀ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ɪɴsᴛᴇᴀᴅ ᴄᴀᴜsᴇᴅ ʙʏ ɪɴᴀᴅᴇϙᴜᴀᴛᴇ ᴛʀᴀɴsᴘᴏʀᴛᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴏғ ғᴏᴏᴅ, ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ɪɴ ᴛᴜʀɴ ᴡᴀs ᴄᴀᴜsᴇᴅ ᴅᴜᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴀɴ ᴀʙsᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴏғ ᴀ ᴘᴏʟɪᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ sᴏᴄɪᴀʟ sᴛʀᴜᴄᴛᴜʀᴇ.

Answered by anmolgarg12
0

Famine had been a recurrent feature of life the Indian sub-continental countries of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, most notoriously during British rule. Famines in India resulted in more than 60 million deaths over the course of the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. Famines in British India were severe enough to have a substantial impact on the long-term population growth of the country in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Indian agriculture is heavily dependent on climate: a favorable southwest summer monsoon is critical in securing water for irrigating crops.[1] Droughts, combined with policy failures, have periodically led to major Indian famines, including the Bengal famine of 1770, the Chalisa famine, the Doji bara famine, the Great Famine of 1876–1878, and the 1943 Bengal famine.[2][3] Some commentators have identified British government inaction as a contributing factor to the severity of famines during the time India was under British rule.[4] Famine largely ended by the start of 20th century with the 1943 Bengal famine being an exception related to complications during World War II. The 1883 Indian Famine Codes, transportation improvements and changes following independence have been identified as furthering famine relief. In India, traditionally, agricultural labourers and rural artisans have been the primary victims of famines. In the worst famines, cultivators have also been susceptible.[5]

Railroads built for the commercial goals of exporting food grains and other agricultural commodities only served to exacerbate economic conditions in times of famine.[6][7] However by the 20th century, the extension of the railroad by the British helped put an end to the massive famines in times of peace.[8]

The last major famine was the Bengal famine of 1943. A famine occurred in the state of Bihar in December 1966 on a much smaller scale and in which "Happily, aid was at hand and there were relatively fewer deaths".[9][10] The drought of Maharashtra in 1970–1973 is often cited as an example in which successful famine prevention processes were employed.[fn 1] In 2016–2018, 194 million of 810 million undernourished people globally[12] lived in India, making the country a key focus for tackling hunger on a global scale. In the last two decades, per capita income more than tripled, yet the minimum dietary intake fell.[13]

Similar questions