HOW, WHEN, AND WHERE. Explain the summary of the chapter on about 100 words. (class8 History NCERT)
Answers
Answer:
How important are dates
Have you ever thought why the dates are so important? Remembering dates is not an easy job. Moreover, it is not even an interesting task for many of us but have you ever thought why we need to remember dates or why we should study history?
Well, anything which we see happening in our surrounding must have begun on someday. For example, we drink tea or coffee but how did it become part of our dietary habit and when it first came into use by man. Not only this, we all must have travelled by train so when did trains start in India. Such questions take us back to the notion of dates and time but time is not always precise. Sometimes, we even don’t know about the exact date or time of that particular happening.
Why we can’t fix a particular date?
We can’t fix a particular date because many of the things happen over a stretch of time. We know that Britishers came to India in 1608 and then they started ruling India from 1757, but do we know the exact date of the year 1757 on which they started ruling? Similarly, if we move back to the example of tea, do we know the exact date on which Indians started drinking tea? That is why it is not possible to fix date for each and every event.
Now the question why we associate dates with history?
It is because in early times, the court historians use to record only the crucial events of a king’s life such as his coronation, marriage and the battles fought by him. So, now we know why dates are important.
Here a question arises that which dates are important?
Which Dateswarren hastings
A date doesn’t become important if something big happened on that day in the past but it gains its significance on the basis of how much keen we are to study the events which happened during a particular time. If our focus changes, the importance of the dates also changes. Let’s take an example the British historians began their history with the first governor general of Bengal Warren Hastings and it continues up to the last viceroy of India Lord Mountbatten. Their history mainly focuses on the activities, policies and the lifestyle of these men. It does not talk about anything else. Here what I want to say is that some other events were also happening at that time in India within the society but nothing was put on record for them. So, the chronology (sequence) of the lives of these British officers marks a different chapter of British history. So, can we write history covering the events which were related to Indian society within the format of the British governor generals?
Yes, we can and for this we have to write it in a sequence so that it not only sounds like a story but also the one with sense. In the process of writing the whole story with a shift in the subject we would be in a need of some new set of dates making the old dates less significant and thus a new set of dates will become important. So for that we have to periodise those events.
How do we periodise?
In 1817 James Mill a Scottish economist and political philosopher wrote three volumes named ‘A history of British India’ following were the contents of his book:
History was divide into three categories namely Hindu, Muslims ,British on the basis of the rulers of different period.
According to Mill, all Asian societies were at a lower level than the European civilisation.
According to him Hindu and Muslim rulers had ruled India and there was huge intolerance against the religion of each other.
Some Social evils were also present such as caste system, superstitious beliefs etc.
According to him it was necessary to introduce European education and manners to them for their upliftment.
Do you think that such an idea can be accepted? First of all we cannot categories Indian history as totally a Hindu history or Muslim history as rulers from both the religions had ruled within the same period of time. Moreover, many other faiths also existed in India simultaneously with Hindu and Muslim religion and they all were practicing their faiths freely. Moving away from the British classification, the historians have divided Indian history into ancient, medieval and modern but this categorization also has some problems. Generally, when we talk about modern period, it denotes the growth of science and technology and also the freedom, liberty and equality to the citizens of that society but during the rule of Britishers there were no such rights given to the Indian citizens rather they were forced by Britishers for one thing or another moreover Britishers took away all the resources and wealth away from India. Thus many of the historians treat it as a ‘colonial’ period.
.
.
Explanation:
Explanation:
sorry sis for answering ur quetion .,,after u report this. ,