Chemistry, asked by 134972, 12 hours ago

How will you prepare 2,3-methylbutane from propane ?​

Answers

Answered by bhartisms
0

Answer:

i) Starting from any alkene

You can create this from 2-butene, or an alkene with a double bond on carbon-2. It theoretically doesn't matter whether it's cis or trans.

I would do this:

Basic bromination in dichloromethane

Add two equivalents of

LiCu

(

CH

3

)

2

, a type of Gilman reagent, to essentially substitute both bromide groups with methyl groups like so

ii) Starting from a grignard reagent

I don't really see the point of starting from a Grignard reagent since it's usually a nucleophile... but:

Water gets rid of the magnesium bromide substituent and substitutes it with a hydrogen

Hydroboration adds anti-Markovnikov to give a hydroxide on the carbon where the magnesium bromide once was

PBr

3

substitutes the hydroxide with a bromide group

MgSO

4

acts as a drying agent to clear the reaction vessel of any water remaining from steps 1 and 2 (you may have used this in lab already); safe way of minimizing potential reactions with water

LiCu

(

CH

3

)

2

substitutes a methyl group in place of the bromide group

iii) Start from step 2 of part i) and do the same thing from that point on

iv) Starting from any sodium alkanoate

This'll take a while to do in real life...

Strong acid protonates the alkanoate to make a carboxylic acid

MgSO

4

dries out the reaction vessel to prevent overly violent reaction in step 3

LiAlH

4

acts as a strong reducing agent that is capable of reducing a carboxylic acid down to the corresponding alcohol

Dilute sulfuric acid terminates the reducing process

PBr

3

substitutes the hydroxide with a bromide group

HBr

with a peroxide causes a radical reaction; essentially, anti-Markovnikov addition of a proton to the dimethylated carbon (bottom left) and a bromide to the upper right carbon.

Two equivalents of

LiCu

(

CH

3

)

2

substitutes with each bromide a methyl group (this is not likely to give that great of a yield due to the steric hindrance, but it's theoretical so it's OK)

Similar questions