How would u convince a man who charge blame to a doctor when his patient brought to hospital at last hour after having treatment from wizard dies?
Answers
Answered by
20
Let's break it down into categories:
Deaths that were not malpractice (the vast majority)
Malpractice.
In Category One, it makes sense that the family should pay. Surgery doesn't come with guarantees. The risks are explained in advance. Most deaths in this category are unavoidable and happen to high-risk patients: not the slim healthy 20-year-old with a bad gallbladder, but the three-hundred pound 78-year-old with a bad heart and lungs. Surgery isn't forced on anyone; it’s offered. The patient opts to take the risk - or not.
When it's malpractice, it's trickier. If the surgeon or anesthesiologist screwed up and killed someone, I see no morality in them demanding money. But that still leaves the hospital bill, which covers the facility, medicines, equipment, and nurses. The hospital isn't responsible for a surgeon’s screw-up. But it's probably a good policy to waive the bill anyway.
A personal story: I worked as a doctor for a corporation. I saw a list of patients each day, and it was my job to submit bills at the end of each week. Once, I missed something on a patient and he took a turn for the worse. I blamed myself. I felt so guilty, I couldn't help telling the family that I was to blame.
They were nice people, very understanding. They wanted me to keep caring for him, so I did, but I never billed them for my work - I just left that patient’s name off the list when I sent the bills on to my company.
Many months later, the family engaged a lawyer and considered suing. Their lawyer asked my company to hand over all my billing for the man - but of course none could be found. This caused great confusion, and I was asked about it, and had to explain to my lawyer that I hadn't had the heart to bill. (I had even deleted my earlier billing, from before the man took his bad turn. I just didn't want that family to have to pay me anything.)
When the family was told I hadn't billed them, they decided not to sue. Their lawyer ended up writing a letter to my lawyer, explaining that this was the deciding factor.
The family was Christian and had struggled over how to treat me. I think if I had billed them, they wouldn't have believed my regret was genuine and would have pressed ahead with the suit. Instead we settled out of court.
If you are satisfied please make me as brilliants..
Deaths that were not malpractice (the vast majority)
Malpractice.
In Category One, it makes sense that the family should pay. Surgery doesn't come with guarantees. The risks are explained in advance. Most deaths in this category are unavoidable and happen to high-risk patients: not the slim healthy 20-year-old with a bad gallbladder, but the three-hundred pound 78-year-old with a bad heart and lungs. Surgery isn't forced on anyone; it’s offered. The patient opts to take the risk - or not.
When it's malpractice, it's trickier. If the surgeon or anesthesiologist screwed up and killed someone, I see no morality in them demanding money. But that still leaves the hospital bill, which covers the facility, medicines, equipment, and nurses. The hospital isn't responsible for a surgeon’s screw-up. But it's probably a good policy to waive the bill anyway.
A personal story: I worked as a doctor for a corporation. I saw a list of patients each day, and it was my job to submit bills at the end of each week. Once, I missed something on a patient and he took a turn for the worse. I blamed myself. I felt so guilty, I couldn't help telling the family that I was to blame.
They were nice people, very understanding. They wanted me to keep caring for him, so I did, but I never billed them for my work - I just left that patient’s name off the list when I sent the bills on to my company.
Many months later, the family engaged a lawyer and considered suing. Their lawyer asked my company to hand over all my billing for the man - but of course none could be found. This caused great confusion, and I was asked about it, and had to explain to my lawyer that I hadn't had the heart to bill. (I had even deleted my earlier billing, from before the man took his bad turn. I just didn't want that family to have to pay me anything.)
When the family was told I hadn't billed them, they decided not to sue. Their lawyer ended up writing a letter to my lawyer, explaining that this was the deciding factor.
The family was Christian and had struggled over how to treat me. I think if I had billed them, they wouldn't have believed my regret was genuine and would have pressed ahead with the suit. Instead we settled out of court.
If you are satisfied please make me as brilliants..
Answered by
18
Answer:
First of all, I asked him that what he got the advantage after having treatment from a wizard and I suggest him that if we wanted to cure diseases of someone, we must went to hospital first. And should provide treatment in time because Time plays a major role for protecting someone's life. We mustn't threw time in different kinds of superstitions beliefs instead of in hospital when he or his family members were sick instead of going wizard magic
Explanation:
hope my opinion helps you.
Similar questions