How would you characterize Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel’s statement: “‘The one thing that we don't know is what the potential of the life would be that was snuffed out in the crime’” (Paragraph 24)?
Answers
Attorney General Dustin McDaniel's supported the idea that juveniles should be imprisoned without parole. For him, people don't know what capability or good things the person who died from the crime or who was a victim of the crime could have contributed to the society. He opposed the view of others who were claiming that imprisoning the juveniles was unfair. The statement shows his strong conviction to what he believes in.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the article entitled "Do Juvenile Killers Deserve Life Behind Bars?," written by Nina Totenberg.
The main idea of the article is to show whether juveniles who commit crime should be put behind bars without parole or not. Opposing sides are being mentioned in the article with some claiming that juveniles still have the chance to be rehabilitated and with others claiming that juveniles also deserve to be punished.
So, this explains the answer.
Answer:
Attorney General Dustin McDaniel agreed that children should serve life sentences without the possibility of parole. According to him, people are unaware of the potential contributions to society that a person who committed a crime and/or died as a result of it may have made.
Explanation:
- The aforementioned query relates to Nina Totenberg's essay "Do Juvenile Killers Deserve Life Behind Bars?."
- The article's main point is to demonstrate whether or not young offenders should be imprisoned without the possibility of release.
- The article mentions opposing viewpoints, with some arguing that juveniles still have a chance at rehabilitation and others arguing that juveniles still need to be punished.
He disagreed with those who thought it was unjust to lock up the young people. The statement demonstrates his steadfast commitment to his beliefs.
#SPJ2