Question

i want a sa on the rights and responsibilities of a citizen in 200 to 210 words

Answer 1

All living in a state are inhabitants and citizens of the state. A citizen of a state enjoys some social and political rights. Besides, a citizen of the state has many duties and responsibilities, just as he has social and economical rights.
 
The relation between state and country is inseparable. As there is a state, there are citizens. Again, the existence of state is beyond imagination without citizens. The more the citizens of a country will become good citizens, the more the country will be developed. So, there is the role of citizens in the development of the country.  
 
   We enjoy various privileges from the country as citizens. These are our fundamental and general rights as citizens. Such as, right to speech, right to freedom, right to education, etc.

   In exchange for it, we also have different duties and responsibilities. We have to perform these duties and responsibilities for the development of the country. 
A citizen must be a permanent inhabitant and be loyal to the state. He must think of the welfare of the state. 

In a modern state, the role of citizen is very important. 
In modern democratic states, people are owners of the absolute power of the state. But, citizens cannot directly participate in the running of the state administration. In democratic states, people can help one party to form the government by voting it to power for a definite tenure. If the government does not perform any good work for the country, people will not vote for that party next time.

Therefore, performing the state administration, establishing good governance and all such types of developments in an indirect manner. It depends on the honesty, and efficiency of citizens. 

So, not only the government is responsible for the development of the country. Citizens also have to perform their duties perfectly. Then, only can the country proceed quickly towards steady development.

Answer 2

The Universal Declaration on Human Rights was pivotal in popularizing the use of ‘dignity’ or ‘human dignity’ in human rights discourse. This article argues that the use of ‘dignity’, beyond a basic minimum core, does not provide a universalistic, principled basis for judicial decision-making in the human rights context, in the sense that there is little common understanding of what dignity requires substantively within or across jurisdictions. The meaning of dignity is therefore context-specific, varying significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and (often) over time within particular jurisdictions. Indeed, instead of providing a basis for principled decision-making, dignity seems open to significant judicial manipulation, increasing rather than decreasing judicial discretion. That is one of its significant attractions to both judges and litigators alike. Dignity provides a convenient language for the adoption of substantive interpretations of human rights guarantees which appear to be intentionally, not just coincidentally, highly contingent on local circumstances. Despite that, however, I argue that the concept of ‘human dignity’ plays an important role in the development of human rights adjudication, not in providing an agreed content to human rights but in contributing to particular methods of human rights interpretation and adjudication.So many roads, so much at stakeSo many dead ends, I’m at the edge of the lakeSometimes I wonder what it's gonna takeTo find dignity1The 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides a suitable opportunity to reflect on one of the key concepts which underpins and informs the human rights enterprise. Due significantly to its centrality in both the United Nations Charter2 and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,3 the concept of ‘human dignity’ now plays a central role in human rights discourse.4 The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) both state that all human rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person.5Dignity is becoming commonplace in the legal texts providing for human rights protections in many jurisdictions.