Question

I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLLEST

Which best justifies the accuracy of the claim?

Although Article 1 mentions evidence discovered by scientists, more research is needed about the data source to determine if the claim is scientific.
Article 1 is a scientific claim because it says that global warming doesn’t create hurricanes.
Although Article 2 mentions the study of a hurricane record, it is a scientific claim because the author himself reviewed it and is therefore an expert.
Article 2 uses a scientific claim because the author says the Earth is in a cooling cycle.

Answer 1

Answer:

Article 2

Explanation:

Hope this help you

Please mark as Brainlist !

Please follow me

Answer 2

Answer:

I do believe it is A.

A

Explanation:

It is probably not B, C, or D because "the Earth is in a cooling cycle" is not a scientific claim, and the author of Article 2 is probably not an expert if they think Climate Change and Global Warming is not serious. The second option is also probably not correct since the statement is not a scientific claim.

Article 1 does give a bit of information that scientists found some evidence, but doesn't not elaborate and jumps right into the next statements.

"Fact is, the earth was cooling and warming long before greenhouse gases could have been a factor. The [global warming supporters] have been proved wrong time and time again."

Michael Fumento, you need to read some more books man.

At least the first article is verified as stated

"Article 1, found on the website of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a certified charitable organization, supports global warming."