Question

Identify the impact of the effectivness of the inclusion of the study in promoting entrepreneurship in the country

Answer 1

Explanation:

So that is a great question the impact of the effectiveness of the inclusion of the study in promoting entrepreneurship in the country we have to identify this impact !

inclusion of study in promoting entrepreneurship is very mean and it has so much effects on the entrepreneurship in the country because education is a must in any of the business department even if it is a rural business or urban business it does affect the study affects every entrepreneurship in the country even if it is a small entrepreneurship or it is a big entrepreneurship on a big level so every business starts from study if we don't have any education don't have any knowledge about the work or business apartment we are gonna build in the future there is no future of the business so that is why the impact of the factors of the of the conclusion of the study in promoting entrepreneurship in the country is the most so study and education is a must in the country to promote entrepreneurship on a big level of state level

Answer 2

Explanation:

Companies increasingly rely on diverse, multidisciplinary teams that combine the collective capabilities of women and men, people of different cultural heritage, and younger and older workers. But simply throwing a mix of people together doesn’t guarantee high performance; it requires inclusive leadership — leadership that assures that all team members feel they are treated respectfully and fairly, are valued and sense that they belong, and are confident and inspired.

Inclusiveness isn’t just nice to have on teams. Our research shows that it directly enhances performance. Teams with inclusive leaders are 17% more likely to report that they are high performing, 20% more likely to say they make high-quality decisions, and 29% more likely to report behaving collaboratively. What’s more, we found that a 10% improvement in perceptions of inclusion increases work attendance by almost 1 day a year per employee, reducing the cost of absenteeism.

What specific actions can leaders take to be more inclusive? To answer this question, we surveyed more than 4,100 employees about inclusion, interviewed those identified by followers as highly inclusive, and reviewed the academic literature on leadership. From this research, we identified 17 discrete sets of behaviors, which we grouped into six categories (or “traits”), all of which are equally important and mutually reinforcing. We then built a 360-degree assessment tool for use by followers to rate the presence of these traits among leaders. The tool has now been used by over 3,500 raters to evaluate over 450 leaders. The results are illuminating.