Question

If a community takes advantage of its numeric majority nd force its will on the minority, it would result in:

a. the formation of a stable government
b. minority accepting the majority rule
c. a serious social problem
d. this would push the conflict among communities further.​

Answer 1

Answer:

If a community takes advantage of its numeric majority and force its will on. the minority, it would result in. this would push the conflict among communities further. ...

Explanation:

please mrk as brainlist

Answer 2

Answer:

Among the political thinkers who have drawn our attention to the notion of compromise, Hans must be rediscovered due to his major contributions to this topic. Surprisingly, he is almost never mentioned today, even in the erudite works on compromise ( 2013) [2]. In this article, I intend to focus on the precursory and substantial link that established between compromise and democracy. We could say that he anticipated the puzzling question raised by in 1979: “Is there a justification in democratic theory for the widespread democratic practice of compromise?” 1979: 41). The theoretical relationship between compromise and democratic regimes that established constitutes his main intellectual contribution compared with other works on the understanding of the notion of compromise. I argue in this article that compromise plays a central role in his theory of democracy because it reconciles the essential features within his view of democracy, namely his positivism, his reluctance about the idea of the common good and his definition of democracy, as summarised via the enforcement of the self-determination principle.

Kelsen’s enthusiastic defence of compromise has to be situated in two specific contexts. On the one hand, Kelsen’s reflections on compromise took place during the interwar period, in a climate of social division and class warfare that was apparent in the political balance of and threat to the new republics, particularly the Weimar and Austrian republics. How could the class warfare that emerged in Europe be prevented from threatening political life? That is the question raised by and other writers such as Hermann Heller [3], Rudolf Smend [4] and Erich Kaufmann [5], who constantly thought about democratic political institutions, particularly parliamentary institutions, with a view towards getting a social plurality to coexist politically. If the question of integration in democracy remained essential for his reflection was not oriented towards the quest for social or political homogeneity, in opposition to the works of Kaufmann and Heller.