History, asked by bhatshahid32, 9 months ago

if abrogation of article 370 is uncontitutional . why did the bjp govtment removed article 370 and 35A from the j&k.?

Answers

Answered by tusharkumar09ppr

Answer:

no it is not unconstitutional, because a parliament can not take decision that is unconstitutional. the reason for that is according to the Instrument of Accession, that was signed by The king of Jammu and kashmir, He agreed to be a part of Union of India. but it was given special status for a particular time, now the Govt. have removed that Article 375 as terrorism was flourishing there, making Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh a part of India just like any other state or UT

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

English, 4 months ago

define mystery please tell the answer ...

Math, 4 months ago

" विशुद्ध प्रेरकत्व मुक्त व... परिपथ में प्रत्यावर्ती वोल्टला VEV. Sih wt लगाया जाता है। निम्न की गणना कीजिए परिषण में बहने वाली धारा कि प्रत्यावर्ती वोल्लता पौर थारा के बीमा कलान्तर प्रेरकीय प्रतिधात ती दिष्ट धारा के लिए प्रेरकीय प्रति घात...

Social Sciences, 4 months ago

vote system. Write True or False for the following statements. 1. The Union Executive comprises of the Prime Minster and the Council of Ministers. 2. The President of India cannot be re-elected for a second term. 3. All the elected members of Parliament and the State Legislative Assemblies elect the President of India. 7. The imposition of emergency in a State is called President's rule. 5. The...

Math, 9 months ago

Solve it with correct answer....otherwise i will report ...

Chemistry, 9 months ago